array(2) { ["nofollow"]=> string(1) "1" ["id"]=> string(1) "6" }

Posts

Best practices companies can follow for predictive analytics and consumer scoring

Best practices companies can follow for predictive analytics and consumer scoring

Summary List Placement

Advances in AI and predictive analytics are using consumer scores to automate business decisions to predict things like risk and fraud. But concern over fairness means companies need to make scores transparent to consumers. Regardless of industry, it’s imperative for businesses to tread carefully with their consumer scoring implementations.

eMarketer how comfortable adults worldwide with companies using ai access personal data improved customer experience of respondents nov 2019 255469

Here are some best practices companies can follow to future-proof their efforts and stay out of the headlines:

    Run a thorough risk analysis. Pam Dixon of the World Privacy Forum posed this hypothetical when speaking to Insider Intelligence: “Pretend that all of your customers learn that you’re using this score. What do you need to do in order to make sure that if that happened, that you could truly defend your purchase of the score, your analysis of the safety and efficacy of the score, your use qualifications and guidelines for the score, your recourse for consumers who were harmed by the use of that score?” Verify data quality and provenance. What data is being used to feed the scoring analytics? Is it authentically permissioned? Make sure models and AI are explainable. Explainability is especially necessary for highly regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, or telecoms, and forthcoming AI regulation is likely to require explainability for all algorithmic decision-making. Be as transparent as possible. What is the range of possible scores? How are the numbers interpreted? How long is the score kept and how frequently is it updated? Companies should also ask vendors if they can inform consumers that they’re using the scoring tool. Evaluate scores for fairness. Even if scores aren’t based on sensitive data, their analytic outcomes can serve as proxies for discrimination. Evaluate scores for disparate impact for protected classes based on age, race, gender, income, etc. Use the right score for the job. Credit scores have been used for applications beyond finance for things like tenant screening, hiring, and even the SAT adversity score. That’s proven contentious with consumers and is potentially subject to regulation. Give consumers access and the ability to contest or correct. Can consumers request their scores? Can they contest an algorithmic decision or review the data points that went into a scoring model?

Want to read more stories like this one? Here’s how you can gain access:

Join other Insider Intelligence clients who receive this Briefing, along with other Connectivity & Tech forecasts, briefings, charts, and research reports to their inboxes each day. >> Become a Client Explore related topics more in depth. >> Browse Our Coverage

Current subscribers can access the entire Insider Intelligence content archive here.

Join the conversation about this story »